Skip to main content
Home
Home

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Domino’s Cert Petition Seeking to Challenge Ninth Circuit Decision Regarding Website Accessibility under the ADA

Consumer Protection Review

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Domino’s Cert Petition Seeking to Challenge Ninth Circuit Decision Regarding Website Accessibility under the ADA

Blue Hour, United States Supreme Court Building, Washington DC, America

Earlier today, the Supreme Court denied a petition filed by Domino's Pizza asking the Court to decide whether Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to websites and mobile apps. 

As we've previously discussed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in January of this year holding that companies whose online activities share a nexus with physical places of public accommodation may be held liable under the Title III for failing to make their websites and apps accessible to persons with disabilities, and that the absence of formal web accessibility regulations implemented by the Department of Justice does not raise due process concerns. The Supreme Court's denial of Domino's appeal means that the Ninth Circuit decision stands. The case is to be remanded to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, which will have to decide in the first instance whether Domino's website and app satisfies the ADA. The Supreme Court's decision leaves unresolved a long-standing circuit split concerning the applicability of the ADA to the Internet, and will no doubt attract further web accessibility suits by disability rights advocates and private plaintiffs.

Print and share

Explore more in

Blog series

Consumer Protection Review

Consumer Protection Review helps businesses that market and sell to consumers navigate federal and state legal issues related to advertising, privacy, promotions, products liability, government investigations, unfair competition, class actions and general consumer protection. 

View the blog
Home
Jump back to top