California Land Use & Development Law Report
California Land Use & Development Law Report
California Land Use & Development Law Report offers insights into legal issues relating to development and use of land and federal, state and local permitting and approval processes.
October 16, 2012
Ninth Circuit Dismisses Federal Nuisance Claim Based on Global Warming
October 16, 2012
No Exception to the Exemption -- Installation of Small Wireless Telecom Equipment on Existing Utility Poles Throughout City is Exempt from CEQA
October 11, 2012
Ninth Circuit Emphasizes Deference to Federal Agencies under NEPA
September 20, 2012
City Suing School District Can Recover Attorneys’ Fees, But Loses Most CEQA Claims
September 10, 2012
Annual Operating Plans for Dam Operation Do Not Require Environmental Reviews
September 10, 2012
Court Upholds "Tributary Rule" But Leaves Open the Possibility of a Future Challenge
September 5, 2012
Ninth Circuit Upholds Fish & Wildlife Service Regulations Against Environmentalists' Challenge
August 30, 2012
Can a Developer Unilaterally Impose an Arbitration Clause on a Condo Homeowners Association?
August 10, 2012
Decision on use of Future CEQA Baseline to be Reviewed by the Supreme Court
August 10, 2012
No Harm, No Foul—Petitioners Claiming Procedural Errors Must Prove Prejudice
It's not enough that litigants challenging planning and zoning actions prove that the city or county committed a procedural error. They also have to show the error was prejudicial, that it led to substantial injury, and that if the error had not occurred, a different result would have been likely.
August 7, 2012
EIR Required for Oak Woodland Management Plan
August 6, 2012
ACLU Files Brief in Support of Building Industry Association
August 4, 2012
Ninth Circuit Upholds Analysis of Narrow Range of Alternatives in EIS
July 25, 2012
The Ninth Circuit Interprets “Agency Action” under the Endangered Species Act - Again
July 20, 2012
CBIA Heads Off Level III Fees
Level II school fees are intended to fund approximately 50% of the cost of school facilities. The other 50% is funded by the state through the Leroy-Greene School Facilities Act of 1998, commonly known as SB-50.