庞米格 Miguel J. Bombach
合伙人 Miguel Bombach 专精于电子和计算机领域的专利。Miguel 的执业领域包括地区法院诉讼，专利初审和上诉委员会 (PTAB) 的多方复审程序，美国专利商标局的专利申请，专利组合以及尽职调查。
Miguel 在完成最终书面决定的多方复审程序方面拥有丰富的经验，并且作为申请人负责处理专利复审和无效案件。Miguel 曾在 PTAB 处理半导体、电磁、计算机网络和电信等方面的案件。他还曾处理过诸多领域的专利诉讼，如半导体、集成电路、存储器、图像处理和电磁学。同时，他在显示技术，逻辑控制系统，OFDM 传输系统和网络，光调制系统，波前光学，无线电话和云计算系统等方面的专利申请方面具有丰富经验。
Miguel曾在美国雷神防御系统公司担任电气工程师，设计并对马萨诸塞州图克斯伯里和日本名古屋雷达系统的计算机硬件和软件进行测试。Miguel 曾被邀请到韩国首尔广播电视台 (SBS) 和阿里郎电视台做特邀嘉宾。
教育与证书
教育
- 纽约大学法学院, J.D., 2010
- 德克萨斯大学埃尔帕索分校, Bachelor of Science, 电气工程, 优等生, 2005
律师和法庭资格
-
California
-
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
相关工作经历
- 美富律师事务所 (Morrison & Foerster, LLP)，加州圣地亚哥， 律师，2011；暑期实习， 2008, 2009
- 美国雷神防御系统公司 (Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems)，马萨诸塞州图克斯伯里，电气工程师 2006 - 2007
News
代理经验
Inter Partes Reviews
Petition for Inter Partes Review by HTC America, Inc. and HTC Corp.
Counsel for petitioner HTC in two IPRs relating to near field communication technologies. All challenged claims in both IPRs were deemed un-patentable via final written decision.
Petition for Inter Partes Review by Netflix, Inc. and Roku, Inc.
Counsel for petitioners Netflix and Roku in IPRs relating to media streaming. Out of six petitions filed, all were instituted. Case settled shortly after institution.
Petition for Inter Partes Review by kCura, LLC
Counsel for petitioner kCura in an IPRs relating to document searching. All claims of challenged patent instituted.
Petition for Inter Partes Review by T-Mobile US, Inc.
Counsel for petitioner T-Mobile in two IPRs against two patents relating to telecommunication networks. Both IPRs were instituted.
Patent Prosecution
Prosecuted patents for various companies, including ZTE Corp, Apple Inc.*, Kyocera Corp.* and others in a variety of technological fields, such as displays, OFDM transmission systems and networks, logic control systems, optical modulation systems, wavefront optics, e-commerce systems, wireless telephones, cloud computing systems and mechanical actuators and tools, among others.
Patent Litigation
ASUSTek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research LLC
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for defendant ASUS in patent litigation relating to memory and semiconductor devices.
NFC Technology, LLC v. HTC America, Inc. et al.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for defendant HTC in patent litigation concerning near field communication and asserted claims invalidated before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board.; pending appeal.
Orostream LLC v. NHL Interactive Cyber Enterprises, LLC/Zuffa, LLC
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for defendants NHL and Zuffa in patent litigation relating to dynamic video delivery; patent invalidated as being subject matter ineligible.
Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. Hulu, LLC/Netflix, Inc./Roku, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Counsel for defendants Hulu, Netflix and Roku in patent litigation relating to media streaming.
Bradium Technologies LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for Microsoft in patent litigation relating to mapping and imagery display.
Transcenic Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for Microsoft in patent litigation relating to mapping and imagery display.
StylePath, Inc. v. Just Fabulous, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Counsel for Just Fabulous in patent litigation related to e-commerce websites.
Clouding IP LLC v. Microsoft Corporation/Amazon Inc. et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for defendant Amazon and Microsoft in patent litigation relating to cloud computing.
Immersion Corporation v. HTC Corporation et. al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Counsel for defendant HTC in patent litigation relating to haptics in mobile phones.
Electronic Imaging Devices, 337-TA-850
International Trade Commission
Counsel for respondents HTC Corporation and HTC America Inc. in patent investigation relating to camera operating system functionality.
EchoStar Technologies Corporation v. TiVo Inc. et al.*
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for EchoStar in patent litigation relating to set-top boxes.
Altera Corp. v. LSI Corp.*
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Counsel for plaintiff Altera in patent litigation relating to memory and transistor devices.
*Prior Experience