Skip to main content
Home
Home

California Land Use & Development Law Report

tree in grassy meadow

California Land Use & Development Law Report

California Land Use & Development Law Report offers insights into legal issues relating to development and use of land and federal, state and local permitting and approval processes.

Placeholder image
May 22, 2020

Public Water Running Through a Privately-Owned Pipe is Not Sufficient to Impose Liability on a Public Entity

The County of San Diego could not be held liable for damage caused by leakage from a privately-owned storm drain pipe on private property merely because water from public property drained through it. Ruiz v. County of San Diego, 47 Cal. App. 5th 504 (2020). A storm drain pipe on plaintiffs' property rusted away, causing flooding that damaged their home. View blog post
Placeholder image
May 15, 2020

Project Denial Invalidated Where Councilmember’s Actions Crossed the Line Into Advocacy Against the Project

The Court of Appeal held that where a city councilmember's actions evinced bias toward the project, the applicant did not receive a fair hearing and the City Council's denial of a conditional use permit would be set aside. View blog post
Placeholder image
May 5, 2020

Misrepresentations Can Bar Agency’s Reliance on CEQA Statute of Limitations

An agency could be equitably estopped from relying on the 35-day statute of limitations applicable to a CEQA Notice of Exemption where the agency had misled the public into expecting the agency would instead circulate a Final EIR for public comment and file a Notice of Determination following project approval. Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. View blog post
Placeholder image
May 5, 2020

No Coastal Development Permit Required Where Coastal Commission Had Certified City’s Local Coastal Program

The City of San Diego was not required to obtain a coastal development permit for a transitional housing project because the Coastal Commission had certified the City's local coastal program, whose provisions therefore applied in lieu of the Commission's regulations. Citizens for South Bay Coastal Access v. City of San Diego, 45 Cal. App. View blog post
Placeholder image
April 29, 2020

Bay Area Construction Now Permitted Under Revised Shelter-in-Place Orders

Bay Area Public Health Officers issued revised shelter-in-place orders on April 29 allowing resumption of all construction projects, outdoor businesses and real estate transaction services, with safety protocols specified in the orders.

View blog post
Placeholder image
April 27, 2020

Supreme Court Rules Clean Water Act May Regulate Discharges Through Groundwater to Navigable Waters

Does the Clean Water Act apply when an underground discharge mixes with groundwater and then ultimately reaches a river or a bay?

View blog post
Placeholder image
April 24, 2020

Intentional Misrepresentations Insufficient to Invalidate Coastal Development Permit Where They Did Not Affect the Coastal Commission’s Decision

The court of appeal rejected a claim that a Coastal Development Permit should be invalidated because it was based on intentional misrepresentations, finding that even if accurate and complete information had been submitted, this would not have caused the Coastal Commission to deny the application or require additional or different conditions. Hubbard v. View blog post
Placeholder image
April 23, 2020

Supreme Court Limits Tort Claims By Homeowners at Superfund Sites

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a wide-ranging decision regarding the rights of homeowners affected by Superfund response actions, ruling that they are bound by CERCLA's ban on additional remedial actions beyond those authorized by the EPA. The case, Atlantic Research Company v. Christian et al., 590 U.S. View blog post
Placeholder image
April 23, 2020

Untimely CEQA Suit Barred Regardless of Substantive Merits

The court of appeal held that CEQA claims filed more than 30 days after the City filed a facially valid Notice of Determination were barred by the statute of limitations regardless of whether the agency lacked authority to approve the project or make the CEQA determination. View blog post
Placeholder image
April 21, 2020

Counties May Reenact Essential Features of an Ordinance Previously Repealed by Referendum After a "Material Change in Circumstances"

Kern County's ordinance banning marijuana dispensaries was validly reenacted because a "material change in circumstances" had occurred since the County previously repealed a similar ordinance in response to a referendum petition.  View blog post
Placeholder image
April 21, 2020

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Approves Historic Agreement for Protection of Monarch Butterflies

On April 8, 2020, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced the finalization of a Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances for the monarch butterfly. Authorized by the Endangered Species Act, a CCAA is a voluntary conservation agreement that addresses the conservation needs of at-risk species before they are listed as endangered or threatened. View blog post
Placeholder image
April 20, 2020

Mitigated Negative Declaration Inadequate for Mixed-Use Project

The Second District Court of Appeal held that a project's potentially significant environmental impacts required preparation of an EIR rather than the mitigated negative declaration adopted by the City. Save the Agoura Cornell Knoll et al. v. View blog post
Placeholder image
April 20, 2020

Vintners Lose Challenge to Local Coastal Program Ban on New Vineyards

A California Court of Appeal upheld denial of a petition by vintners challenging the prohibition on new vineyards within the Santa Monica Mountains Coastal Zone in deference to the California Coastal Commission's finding that viticulture adversely impacts sensitive habitats, water quality, water supply, and scenic resources. View blog post
Placeholder image
April 9, 2020

Takings Claim Unripe Where Property Owner Knowingly Failed to Seek Exemption from City Requirements

The Ninth Circuit upheld dismissal of a takings claim as unripe because plaintiffs did not seek a timely exemption from the City's requirements for conversion of property into condominium ownership. Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco, No. View blog post
Placeholder image
April 1, 2020

Non-Essential Construction No Longer Allowed Under New Bay Area Shelter-in-Place Orders

 

View blog post
Home
Jump back to top