AMERCO Inc., et al. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, et al.
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
Represented PricewaterhouseCoopers in defense of professional malpractice and other claims seeking more than $2.5 billion in damages.
Arizona Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local #395 Pension Trust Fund v. Coopers & Lybrand LLP
Court of Appeals of Arizona
U.S. Supreme Court of Arizona
Represented Coopers & Lybrand LLP in a fraud and racketeering suit concerning The Mercado project in downtown Phoenix. Obtained affirmance of summary judgment on corporate fraud and conspiracy claims on statute of limitations grounds.
Sell v. Sewell, et al.
U.S. Supreme Court of Arizona
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
Represented regional accounting firm and two of its partners in action alleging Arizona Securities Act, breach of fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation claims. All claims dismissed except for negligent misrepresentation claims based on the investments of eleven of the more than one hundred and fifty investors. The remaining negligent misrepresentation claims were settled after obtaining landmark ruling by the Arizona Supreme Court rejecting aiding and abetting claims under the Arizona Securities Act.
In the Matter of Coopers & Lybrand LLP, et al. (and also in Symington Litigation)
State Board of Accountancy of Arizona
Represented Coopers & Lybrand LLP in connection with the Arizona Accountancy Board's investigation of various professional engagements for former Arizona Governor J. Fife Symington III and related entities. Also was counsel for Coopers & Lybrand, which was subpoenaed to produce documents and testify at Symington's criminal trial and bankruptcy proceedings.
In re Fulton Homes Corporation
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Represented third-party Deloitte & Touche LLP and several audit and tax partners and managers in connection with Chapter 11 discovery and confirmation trial proceedings.
Thompson, et al. v. Paul, et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Counsel for regional law firm in action in federal district court, District of Arizona, alleging securities fraud, malicious prosecution, and other claims. Motion to dismiss granted. Settled on favorable grounds upon remand after appeal to Ninth Circuit.
Case Filed Against Am Law 100 Law Firm
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Defense counsel for a national law firm in a suit by the Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of a national restaurant chain seeking more than $2 billion in damages.
Unitech Industries Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
Represented Coopers & Lybrand in action alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, professional negligence, consumer fraud and Arizona racketeering. Fraud claims against Coopers & Lybrand were dismissed. Case was settled after evidence in support of a claim for $37 million in damages was excluded.
Robert G. Hoag v. Daniel G. Bach, et al.
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
Represented PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in negligent misrepresentation action. All claims against PricewaterhouseCoopers dismissed with prejudice.
Western Savings & Loan Association Litigation
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Represented Deloitte & Touche LLP in class action and other related securities cases.
Schmidt v. Blanchard
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Represented Deloitte & Touche in derivative action alleging breach of fiduciary duties and other misconduct by officers, directors and outside auditors of eFunds Corporation.
Maniatis v. Janos
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Represented Deloitte & Touche LLP in a malpractice and securities action. Summary judgment granted dismissing claims against Deloitte & Touche LLP.
State of Arizona v. Farm & Home Life Ins. Company
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Three securities cases. Settled after orders were entered dismissing Deloitte & Touche LLP from two of the cases and dismissing all but three claims in the third action.
In the Matter of Touche Ross & Company
State Board of Accountancy of Arizona
Represented Touche Ross in investigation of audit engagements by Arizona Accountancy Board. Concluded with no revocation or suspension of professional licenses.
Case Filed Against National Law Firm
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
Defended national law firm against malpractice and related claims asserted by City of Mesa. Motion to dismiss granted.
Case Filed Against Southwest Law Firm
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Defended law firm in action against company and outside counsel for malicious prosecution, libel and slander. Motion to dismiss granted.
Case Filed Against Southwest Law Firm
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Represented regional law firm in malpractice action in the Federal District Court, District of Arizona. Summary judgment granted with award of attorneys’ fees.
Tonnemacher v. Sasak
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Defense of Deloitte & Touche LLP in securities action.
Johnson v. Sasak
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
Defended Deloitte & Touche LLP in federal and state class actions in Arizona. Summary judgment granted dismissing Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Sell v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
Represented Deloitte & Touche LLP in malpractice action. Dismissed with prejudice.
Robert & Jennifer Deer v. Richard Brooks
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County
Counsel for regional accounting firm in malpractice action. Motion for summary judgment granted dismissing all claims with prejudice.
Terry Kent Brewer, et al. v. LaRue Crockett, et al.
Superior Court of Arizona, Gila County
Superior Court of Arizona, Navajo County
Defense counsel for LDS Family Services and individual professional counselor in multiple lawsuits seeking damages for negligent adoption and counseling services. All lawsuits dismissed with prejudice, and fees awarded.