Skip to main content
Home
Home

Jena A. MacLean

Partner

Jena A. MacLean

Jena leads Perkins Coie's Native American Law & Policy practice, which advises clients on issues relating to Indian tribes, Alaska Native corporations and villages, and tribal lands.

Jena MacLean's practice focuses on the fee-to-trust process, tribal gaming approvals, compact negotiations, and infrastructure, natural resource, and economic development projects on tribal lands. An experienced litigator, Jena handles complex civil litigation involving the scope of tribal sovereign immunity and treaty rights, gaming disputes, fire claims and other torts, and federal preemption questions. She also handles cases arising under the Administrative Procedure Act, including challenging federal regulations and federal agency decisions.

Jena has represented clients before the U.S. Supreme Court, numerous federal appellate and trial courts, and state courts. She also provides clients regulatory counseling on matters pending before the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM), the United States Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

With experience in a wide range of environmental and Indian laws, including the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (IRA), Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), National Indian Forest Resources Management Act (NIFRMA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act (CWA), National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and Endangered Species Act (ESA), Jena has a proven track record of effectively helping clients navigate complex challenges involving Indian tribes and tribal lands.

Education & Credentials

Education

  • Princeton University, A.B., 1993
  • University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 2001

Bar and Court Admissions

  • District of Columbia
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Related Employment

  • Beveridge and Diamond PC, Washington, D.C., Summer Associate, 1999
  • University of Idaho, Department of Soil Science, Moscow, ID, Environmental Chemist, 1994-1996
  • Idaho Environmental Policy Analysis Group, Moscow, ID, Field Researcher/Analyst, 1995-1996
  • Aurtex Inc., Gold Mining Company, Exploration Geologist, 1990-1995

Professional Recognition

  • Recognized by Chambers USA as "America's Leading Lawyer" for Native American Law (Nationwide), 2016-2024

  • Listed in Best Lawyers in America: Native American Law, 2020-2023

Impact

Professional Leadership

  • Law360's Native American Law Editorial Board

Professional Experience

Litigation Experience: U.S. Supreme Court

Poarch Band of Creek Indians v. Wilkes 

Represented clients injured in an automobile accident in defending the decision of the Alabama Supreme Court, which held that tribal sovereign immunity does not bar tort claims asserted by individuals who have no personal or commercial relationship with the tribe and who have been injured by the tribe’s off-reservation commercial conduct. (17-1175)

Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Lundgren 

Represented property owners during the petition and merits stages before the U.S. Supreme Court, defending the decision of the Washington Supreme Court, which held that tribal sovereign immunity does not bar in rem actions in property dispute over fee land. (17-387)

Lewis v. Clarke 

Represented clients injured in an automobile accident in the petition and merits stage before the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging the decision of the Connecticut Supreme Court, which held that non-Indians are immune from suit for the torts they commit off-reservation in the course of their employment for a tribal entity. (15-1500)

Washington v. United States

Represented business, home building, real estate, farming, and municipal organizations in an amicus capacity on the question of whether tribal treaty fishing rights required the state of Washington to modify culverts that impair salmon populations. (17-269)

Herrera v. Wyoming 

Represented Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies in amicus capacity on the question of whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated tribal hunting rights in the Second Treaty of Fort Laramie. (17-532)

Litigation Experience: Federal Courts of Appeal and District Courts

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Riverside County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 
U.S. District Court for Central District of California
Represented Riverside County, California in defending a challenge to the State of California’s possessory interest tax, as imposed on non-Indians leasing lands from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians.

New Mexico v. Black

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
U.S. District Court for New Mexico
Represented the State of New Mexico in challenging the Department of the Interior’s regulations for tribes to obtain gaming procedures in lieu of a tribal-state compact for class III gaming.

Citizens Against Reservation Shopping v. Haugrud

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Represented citizen group in challenging the Secretary of the Interior’s authority to acquire land in trust under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (IRA), the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), and NEPA after Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009).

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Beaudreau

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Represented the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound in challenging the decisions of the BOEM and the U.S. Coast Guard to approve an off-shore wind energy project in Nantucket Sound under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) and NEPA.

Kawaiisu Tribe v. Salazar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Defended Tejon Ranch, the largest private landowner in California, against aboriginal land and treaty claims by an unrecognized group of Indians.

Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of Ledyard

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
U.S. District Court for Connecticut
Defended the Town of Ledyard’s right to impose and collect personal property taxes on property owned by non-Indians but leased to an Indian tribe and used for gaming activities on a reservation.

Delaware Nation v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. District Court for Eastern District Pennsylvania
Defended the governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania against a land claim by the Delaware Nation based on the Indian Intercourse Act and federal common law.

State Courts and Administrative Boards

Albrecht et. al v. Riverside County

California Superior Court
Represented Riverside County, California in multi-party refund action for possessory interest taxes assessed on non-Indian possessory interests in tribal lands.

Herpel et. al v. Riverside County

California Court of Appeals
California Superior Court
Represented Riverside County, California in class action related to possessory interest taxes assessed on non-Indian possessory interests in tribal lands.

Citizens for a Better Way v. Governor Brown

California Supreme Court
Represented environmental group challenging the governor’s authorization of gaming on off-reservation land under IGRA and the California Constitution.

Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. BIA

Interior Board of Indian Appeals
Challenged a decision by the BIA to acquire land in trust for the Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians within a few miles of the Viejas Reservation and Casino. We demonstrated that although the stated purpose of the trust acquisition was for the development of a health clinic, its real purpose was to facilitate plans by the Ewiiaapaayp Band to remove an existing health clinic from trust land to develop a casino. The Interior Board of Indian Appeals remanded the decision to BIA for violations of the Indian Reorganization Act, National Environmental Policy Act and Administrative Procedure Act.

Regulatory Experience

Represents Governmental Entities and Utilities in Obtaining or Renewing Rights of Way and/or Easements Across Tribal Lands

Counseled a number of clients regarding BIAs’ new regulations governing rights-of-way or easements across tribal lands; assisted clients in negotiating new rights-of-way and regulatory compliance.

Environmental Counseling for Renewable Energy Projects

Represented solar company seeking permits to develop solar facilities on public lands in California. Representation involved counseling during the regulatory process, assessment of litigation risk, and development of regulatory and litigation strategy.

Environmental Counseling for Offshore Oil and Gas Development

Represented oil and gas companies seeking exploration and development permits in the offshore environment. Representation involved counseling during the regulatory process, assessment of litigation risk, and development of regulatory and litigation strategy.

Home
Jump back to top