Skip to main content
Home
Home

Perkins Coie Lawyers Mentioned in Multiple Publications Regarding Pro Bono Representation of a Client in the U.S. Supreme Court Case Smith v. Arizona

1
min
General News

Perkins Coie Lawyers Mentioned in Multiple Publications Regarding Pro Bono Representation of a Client in the U.S. Supreme Court Case Smith v. Arizona

Perkins Coie lawyers were mentioned in multiple media publications regarding the firm's pro bono representation of a client in the U.S. Supreme Court case Smith v. Arizona that raises an important issue under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment regarding a criminal defendant's right to cross-examine a non-testifying forensic analyst.

01.10.2024 - Law360 - "Justices Toy With New Testimony Rule In Ariz. Expert Dispute"

01.10.2024 - The National Law Journal - "Justices Seem Skeptical of 'Substitute Expert' Used in Arizona Criminal Trial"

01.10.2024 - SCOTUS Blog - "Court appears to favor Arizona man's confrontation clause claim"

Home
Jump back to top