Monthly Antitrust Newsletter - The Bug
The Perkins Coie antitrust team is excited to share with you our new monthly newsletter: The Bug.
It sets out our selection of the most recent developments at the intersection of antitrust and technology in the US, EU, and UK, as well as what to look out for in the coming months.
April 2026 – This month's issue features the DOJ's proposed settlement with a revenue management software provider restricting use of competitors' nonpublic data and offering guidance on algorithmic pricing risk, the debate on crisis cartels amid geopolitical tensions discussed by DG Competition Director-General Anthony Whelan, the DOJ's investigation of the NFL over streaming costs, the extended public comment period to May 21, 2026 for DOJ and FTC competitor collaboration guidelines, the EC's new EU Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation effective May 1, 2026, the EC's supplementary SO to Meta on API access for third-party AI interoperability with WhatsApp, the CMA's acceptance of Apple and Google commitments under the DMCC Act on app review and interoperability, the CMA's acceptance of Amazon and Microsoft cloud commitments and announcement of a May 2026 Microsoft business software investigation, upcoming EC merger guidelines, the EDPB's summer Guidelines on Anonymization, and the EU's proposal to ease state aid rules for the energy crisis.
March 2026 – This month's issue features the growing global focus on algorithmic pricing, including the UK CMA's investigation of hotel data analytics tools and guidance on algorithms, the EC's confidential investigations, Italian and Dutch market investigations of aviation pricing, the DOJ's proposed settlement with Live Nation allowing Ticketmaster's system as a standalone platform without divestiture, Google and Epic Games' worldwide Play Store settlement, the Ninth Circuit's denial of NHK Spring's rehearing on hard-drive component pricing, the FTC's refusal to quash a NewsGuard Technologies subpoena regarding alleged viewpoint censorship, President Trump's Ratepayer Protection Pledge for data center power costs, the EC and EDPB's public consultation on DMA and GDPR interplay, and the Italian Competition Authority's quantum computing market investigation.
February 2026 – This month's issue features expanding antitrust enforcement in AI and digital markets, including EU competition authorities' scrutiny of AI value chain distribution and deployment practices, the DOJ's inaugural $1 million antitrust whistleblower award, U.S. Senators' calls for investigation of AI acqui-hiring deals, the DOJ and plaintiff states' cross-appeal in the Google Search case, the European Commission's investigation of Google's use of publisher content for AI Overviews and YouTube content to train GenAI models, the UK CMA's consultation on Apple and Google mobile platform commitments, and the European Commission's Digital Networks Act and Digital Omnibus proposals.
January 2026 – This month's issue features significant antitrust developments in digital platforms and AI, including the Ninth Circuit's ruling on Apple's App Store practices, the DOJ's landmark settlement with RealPage on algorithmic pricing, regulatory investigations by the European Commission into Meta and Google's AI practices, and emerging merger control considerations for data-driven transactions.
December 2025 – This month's issue features an examination of state legislative efforts to combat algorithmic price-fixing and digital collusion, including analysis of enacted laws in California, New York, and Connecticut, as well as key compliance considerations for businesses.
November 2025 – This month’s issue features an overview regarding the judicial and regulatory scrutiny of Apple’s iOs and App Store ecosystems, as well updates on pricing algorithms in the antitrust context.
October 2025 – This month’s issue features recent developments in Epic Games, Inc. v. Google LLC and includes other key developments on both sides of the Pond.
September 2025 – This month’s issue includes our thoughts on the German Federal Court of Justice’s recent clarification regarding the scope of “substantial domestic operations” under the merger control transaction value test as well as other developments on both sides of the Pond.