How Not To Be a Bad Apple: Lessons From the Epic v. Apple Injunction Ruling
In a landmark decision, a federal judge found that Apple had failed to comply with a court order in the high-profile Epic Games antitrust case. Join our webinar as we unpacked the far-reaching implications of this ruling for the broader tech industry. We explored the court’s decision, a recent European Union decision against Apple, and what it all meant for digital marketplaces, payment systems, developers, and the enforcement of unfair competition laws.
More on the Case
The court ruled that Apple’s ongoing restrictions on how app developers can direct users to alternative payment methods did not meet the original injunction’s requirements, which prohibited Apple from retaliating against developers for communicating with users. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers didn’t mince words, stating that Apple “chose poorly” and deliberately took “the most anticompetitive option”—a move that could have widespread consequences for the company and its entire app ecosystem. The judge’s decision not only reinforces the need for genuine compliance with court orders, but also signals serious consequences, as the matter was referred to the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California to consider whether criminal contempt proceedings against Apple are warranted.
Resources:
Print and share
Speakers
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.