Skip to main content
Home
Home

Is Your Trademark Notice an Advertising Claim?

Consumer Protection Review

Is Your Trademark Notice an Advertising Claim?

Consumer Protection image, customer holding a product in a grocery store

In an unusual decision[1] this month, the National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs (NAD) recommended that Planting Hope Brands (PHB), a plant-based food and beverage company, discontinue its use of the registered trademark symbol or ® on the packaging and advertising for its product RIGHTRICE, a plant-derived flour-based kernel. 

In the Fast-Track SWIFT challenge before the NAD, Riviana Foods, Inc., argued that PHB's use of the trademark symbol was misleading because PHB no longer possessed a registration for the mark RIGHTRICE.  While PHB previously had a registration for the mark, its registration was canceled by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) in a default judgment proceeding after PHB failed to respond to a petition for cancellation filed by the USA Rice Federation. 

While PHB had filed a motion to set aside the default judgment, the motion remained pending at the time of the NAD's decision. Accordingly, the NAD recommended that PHB's use of the registered trademark symbol for RIGHTRICE be discontinued until there is a final determination reinstating PHB's registration.

Under the Lanham Act, while notice of trademark registration is not required as a condition of trademark protection, a trademark holder's failure to use the trademark registration symbol or other notice might limit its right to obtain monetary damages or profits for infringement that occurred before the infringer had actual notice of the trademark registration. Improper notice of the trademark registration symbol, such as through use of the ® before registration is obtained is considered to be "fraud" by the USPTO.[2]

This appears to be the first time that the NAD has explicitly recognized that an advertiser's use of a trademark symbol can itself constitute a claim.


[1] Planting Hope Brands, LLC (RIGHTRICE ), Report #7308, NAD/CARU Case Reports (March 2024).

[2] TMEP §906.04 ("Improper use of the federal registration symbol ® that is deliberate and intends to deceive or mislead the public or the USPTO is fraud.").

Print and share

Authors

Profile Picture
Partner
JHGray@perkinscoie.com

Notice

Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.

602.351.8092
Profile Picture
Counsel
TCarter@perkinscoie.com

Notice

Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.

650.838.4786

Explore more in

Blog series

Consumer Protection Review

Consumer Protection Review helps businesses that market and sell to consumers navigate federal and state legal issues related to advertising, privacy, promotions, products liability, government investigations, unfair competition, class actions and general consumer protection. 

View the blog
Home
Jump back to top