Skip to main content
Home
Home

SEC Proposes Changes to How Funds Disclose How They Voted

Public Chatter

SEC Proposes Changes to How Funds Disclose How They Voted

In the making for a long time, the SEC proposed rules yesterday that would change how mutual funds disclose their proxy voting – and would require institutional investors to disclose their say-on-pay voting records for the first time. Here's the 174-page proposing release. It's been 18 years since the SEC first started requiring public disclosure of mutual fund voting – on Form N-PX – and many believe that changes have been long overdue (there was a SEC proposal in 2010 that didn't go anywhere). That's because the Form N-PXs can be difficult to parse – some are hundreds of pages long – even a thousand pages long – and in a format that is challenging to the lay reader. Each fund can format their N-PX any way they choose under the SEC's existing rules. The reports also aren't machine readable, a "must" in today's world. It's a real scattershot framework that doesn't produce disclosure that can be readily consumed. Here are six things to know about the SEC's proposal: 1. More Uniformity for Agenda Item Descriptions - Funds would be required to use the same language to describe each voting matter as is used on the company's form of proxy - and to categorize each matter by category and subcategory. 2. More Uniformity for How N-PX Is Organized – Funds would be required organize their reports a certain way in order to make the disclosures easier to read and compare across funds. 3. "Machine Learning" Enabled – Funds would be required to use a structured data language. 4. Disclosure About Securities Lending Activities - Funds would be required to disclose how their securities lending activities impact voting. Some funds "loan" their holdings in a manner that allows others to vote their shares – this activity would be disclosed under this proposal. 5. Institutional Investor Disclosure About "Say-on-Pay" Voting – Institutional investment managers, as defined by Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act, would be required to disclose how they voted on executive compensation, or "say-on-pay," matters, something that funds already disclose in their N-PXs. 6. Form N-PXs Still Due Annually By August 31st – Leading up to the proposal, there was speculation that the SEC would propose more frequent – or at least, a shorter – deadline for reporting. However, the SEC proposes to leave the August 31st annual deadline as it is.

Print and share

Explore more in

Blog series

Public Chatter

Public Chatter provides practical guidance—and the latest developments—to those grappling with public company securities law and corporate governance issues, through content developed from an in-house perspective. Subscribe 🡢

View the blog
Home
Jump back to top