New Filings - April 3, 2017

Consumer Advocacy Grp., Inc. v. Chulada, Inc., et al., No. BC651577: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Los Angeles Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging defendants fail to warn consumers that their ground shrimp contains cadmium and cadmium compounds, and lead and lead compounds. Envtl. Research Ctr., Inc. v. Blackstone Labs, LLC, No. RG17-850885: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Alameda Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging Defendant fails to warn consumers that its dietary supplements contain lead and cadmium. Consumer Advocacy Grp., Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., No. BC651902: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Los Angeles Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging Defendants fail to warn consumers that their jarred anchovies contain lead. Envtl. Research Ctr., Inc. v. HealthAid Ltd., et al., No. RG17-851198: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Alameda Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging Defendant fails to warn consumers that its dietary supplements contain lead and lead compounds. Ctr. For Envtl. Health v. BFY Brands, Inc., et al., No. RG17-851470: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Alameda Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging Defendants fail to warn consumers that their fried or baked potato or sweet potato-based snacks contain acrylamide. Consumer Advocacy Grp., Inc. v. Rani Foods, LP, et al., No. BC652718: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Los Angeles Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging Defendants fail to warn consumers that their turmeric powder contains lead and lead compounds. Envtl. Research Ctr. v. Spartan Brands, Inc., No. RG17-851427: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Alameda Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging Defendant's skin-enhancing drinks contain lead. Envtl. Research Ctr. v. Designer Protein LLC, No. RG17-851422: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Alameda Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging Defendant's dietary supplements contain cadmium, lead, and lead compounds. Envtl. Research Ctr. v. Vitalab Co., Inc., et al., No. RG17-851569: (Cal. Super. Ct. – Alameda Cnty.): Proposition 65 action alleging Defendant's dietary supplements contain lead.