What Justices' Pork Ruling Means For Interstate Cannabis
Tommy Tobin wrote an article published in Law360 on the what the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross means for interstate commerce in regards to cannabis.
The divided opinion comes as the nation's federal courts grapple with a novel paradox raised by the illegality of marijuana at the federal level amid state legalization: If there cannot legally be interstate commerce in cannabis, does the dormant commerce clause still apply?
Print and share
Authors
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.