Ninth Circuit Takes Sting Out of California Anti-SLAPP Law Again
An en banc panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit further narrowed the protections available in federal court under California’s anti-SLAPP law, which provides an avenue for quickly disposing of meritless lawsuits that seek to chill First Amendment rights.
The ruling in Gopher Media LLC v. Melone extends a trend of Ninth Circuit decisions that have significantly limited the protections provided by California’s anti-SLAPP law and has three major implications for litigants:
- Forum selection matters more than ever, with California state court offering significantly stronger anti-SLAPP protections than federal court.
- The long-term viability of anti-SLAPP motions in federal court remains uncertain.
- Anti-SLAPP motions remain available in Ninth Circuit federal courts, and the potential for substantial attorney’s fee awards still makes them a valuable tool for defendants facing suits targeting their speech.
Print and share
Authors
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.