FINRA In-House Courts Face Challenges, Jarkesy Ripple Effect
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5234/a5234eef10674c2c28c8c5fbe9828fd7247bb781" alt="Supreme Court"
When the US Supreme Court heard arguments in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy last month, the justices’ questions suggested the court would likely declare the SEC’s in-house tribunal at least partially unconstitutional.
In the Jarkesy proceedings, the Fifth Circuit held that the SEC’s in-house adjudication of securities fraud claims violates the Seventh Amendment, creating further uncertainty for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. FINRA’s own in-house tribunal structure already faces a constitutional challenge in Alpine Securities Corp. v. FINRA.