Expect Merger Enforcement To Roll Full Steam Ahead
At the American Bar Association's 2023 Antitrust Spring Meeting, held in March in Washington, D.C., representatives of the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division and Federal Trade Commission confirmed their agenda to reinvigorate and modernize antitrust merger enforcement.
Federal enforcers conveyed a consistent theme that the past four decades of antitrust enforcement have been plagued by fear of overenforcement and by overreliance on rigid economic models that fail to capture market realities.
The antitrust agencies have not been afraid to bring more difficult merger challenges, but they have had limited success in litigation. However, DOJ and FTC representatives projected confidence and optimism despite recent setbacks in court.
The DOJ has lost three of its last four merger challenges in federal court. Two challenges — U.S. v. U.S. Sugar Corp. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on Sept. 23 and U.S. v. Booz Allen Hamilton Holdings Corp. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland on Oct. 11 — failed because the court found that the DOJ did not carry its burden to define a relevant antitrust market under the Clayton Act.
Read the full article on Law360.*
*Subscription-based publication
Print and share
Authors
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.