The Delaware Supreme Court’s Blue Bell Creameries Decision: Lessons on Risk Oversight and Independence From Marchand v. Barnhill
In its June 2019 Marchand v. Barnhill opinion, the Delaware Supreme Court provided guidance for directors (and their advisors) in two key areas—compliance and independence.
In Marchand, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Chancery Court's dismissal of a stockholder derivative complaint. The complaint had alleged a breach of the duty of loyalty under Caremark by two key executives and the directors of Blue Bell Creameries USA Inc., an ice cream producer.
The Chancery Court had previously dismissed the complaint for failure to plead demand futility, that is, for failure to make a pre-litigation demand on the board of directors. As author of the opinion, Chief Justine Strine expressed the Delaware Supreme Court's view that to avoid liability under Caremark, boards must demonstrate that they have instituted and supervised a board-level process to oversee and monitor a system of compliance that addresses the company's mission-critical risks. The Marchand decision also states the Delaware Supreme Court's view that the standard for independence of a director who is considering a stockholder demand to initiate litigation against company insiders may be higher than the degree of independence required for less significant board decisions.
Click here to read the full article in the Corporate Governance Advisor.
Print and share
Authors
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.