Skip to main content
Home
Home

California Land Use & Development Law Report

tree in grassy meadow

California Land Use & Development Law Report

California Land Use & Development Law Report offers insights into legal issues relating to development and use of land and federal, state and local permitting and approval processes.

Placeholder image
September 25, 2013

EPA Publishes Draft Scientific Report To Support Significant Expansion of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

On September 17, 2013, the Environmental Protection Agency announced the release of a draft scientific report that is widely seen as a prelude to upcoming regulations that would significantly expand federal permitting jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. View blog post
Placeholder image
September 24, 2013

Ninth Circuit Moves Low Carbon Fuel Regulations Closer to Validation

Many CEQA and NEPA analyses of greenhouse gas impacts assume implementation of the Low Carbon Fuel Standard adopted by the California Air Resources Board. In a boost to the credibility of these analyses, the Ninth Circuit has dissolved a pending injunction and rejected multiple challenges to the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. View blog post
Placeholder image
September 16, 2013

California Supreme Court To Hear San Jose Affordable Housing Case.

 The California Supreme Court has granted a petition by the California Building Industry Association for review of an appellate court's  decision upholding a San Jose affordable housing ordinance.  The court of appeal found the ordinance to be a valid exercise of the City's police powers, reversing a lower court ruling that the city had not shown a reasonable relationship between

View blog post
Placeholder image
September 13, 2013

Senate Bill 743: Legislature Sends CEQA Amendments to Governor

Following a week of intense negotiations, the Legislature has sent Governor Brown a set of  CEQA amendments.  Senate Bill 743 replaces – at least for now -- Senate Bill 731, which had become an unwieldy mass of 15 separate CEQA revisions.  (See our April 26 post

View blog post
Placeholder image
September 5, 2013

All About Drakes Bay and Oysters, Little Oysters.

In a case the court described as pitting "an oyster farm, oyster lovers and well-known 'foodies' against environmentalists," the Ninth Circuit has upheld denial of a preliminary injunction against the Interior Secretary's decision not to extend a permit for commercial oyster farming at Point Reyes National Seashore.  View blog post
Placeholder image
August 28, 2013

County Can Establish Winery Uses By Right Despite Environmental Impacts

San Diego County's decision to permit visitor-serving wineries by right has survived CEQA and general plan challenges.  San Diego Citizenry Group v. County of San Diego, 219 Cal. App. View blog post
Placeholder image
August 20, 2013

Faulty Greenhouse Gas Analysis Sinks EIR

An environmental impact report must not only identify a proper significance threshold for a project's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; it must then correctly apply that threshold.  The EIR for a Wal-Mart Supercenter failed this test in Friends of Orov

View blog post
Placeholder image
August 13, 2013

No CEQA Review Required For Adoption of CEQA Thresholds of Significance

A court of appeal today rejected a CEQA challenge to an air pollution control district's published thresholds of significance for air pollution impacts.  California Building Industry Association v Bay Area Air Quality Management District, No. 135335 (First District, July 13, 2013).  

View blog post
Placeholder image
August 6, 2013

Use Of Future Baseline In CEQA Analysis Approved By California Supreme Court

The California Supreme Court has both resolved a split in the appellate courts and forged new law on the baselines agencies may use to assess projects' environmental effects under CEQA.  Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority, Case No. S202828 (Cal.

View blog post
Placeholder image
August 5, 2013

City Council's Interpretation of General Plan Prevails Despite Conflict With Plan's Land Use Map

A city council has sweeping authority to interpret the city's general plan.  That authority trumped a successful referendum campaign designed to block a residential development project, according to the court's decision  in Orange Citizens for Parks and Recreation v.

View blog post
Placeholder image
August 2, 2013

Offsite Conservation Easements Are Feasible Mitigation For Loss Of Agricultural Resources According to Appellate Court

The First District Court of Appeal has ruled an EIR inadequate for failure to explore fully the use of conservation easements to mitigate impacts to agricultural resources. Masonite Corporation v. County of Mendocino, No. View blog post
Placeholder image
July 31, 2013

Specific Limitations Period In Government Code Prevails Over Statute of Limitations In CEQA

A 30-day limitations period for a challenge to a project that is exempted from CEQA by Government Code section 65457 applies rather than the 35-day limitations period that ordinarily applies after a notice of exemption is filed, according to the court in View blog post
Placeholder image
July 28, 2013

Under the Public Records Act, agencies must allow access to land use databases.

The California Supreme Court has unanimously held that a public agency must allow access to a database of information on land use parcels, rejecting the claim that such information is subject to the "computer software" exemption under the Public Records Act. 

View blog post
Placeholder image
July 25, 2013

Pre-Approval Disclosures Between Agency and Applicant Waive Privileges In CEQA Cases.

The Fifth Appellate District has issued another in a series of decisions regarding administrative records in CEQA cases.  The court held that the "common interest doctrine" does not protect otherwise privileged communications shared by a developer and an agency prior to approval of a project because the two cannot be considered to be advancing any shared interest at the preapproval stage.&

View blog post
Placeholder image
July 22, 2013

County Can’t Use Growth Control Initiative to Bar Previously-Approved Project

It takes an unusual set of circumstances for a California appellate court to find a regulatory taking based on denial of a discretionary land use entitlement.  But those circumstances existed in a recent case in which the court not only found a taking, but upheld an award of attorney's fees to the developer for both the inverse condemnation and related civil rights claims.  View blog post
Home
Jump back to top