After Chevron: Conservation Rule Already Faces Challenges
On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a decades-old precedent, known as Chevron deference, that favored federal agencies' rulemaking interpretations. In this Expert Analysis for Law360, Stacey Bosshardt discusses the decision's likely impact on rulemaking and litigation across practice areas.
Just two months have passed since the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, but litigants are already using it to challenge agency regulations in the field of environmental law and natural resource management to overturn and otherwise test the boundaries of that ruling.[1]
Print and share
Authors
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.