California Land Use & Development Law Report
California Land Use & Development Law Report
California Land Use & Development Law Report offers insights into legal issues relating to development and use of land and federal, state and local permitting and approval processes.
CEQA Not Preempted by Federal Rail Transportation Law for Projects Carried Out by State Agencies
Federal Courts Lack Jurisdiction to Hear Challenges to EPA Objections to State Water Pollution Discharge Permits
NEPA Violations Did Not Undermine Validity of EIS for Nuclear Missile Maintenance Facility
Air District Permit May Be Challenged Under CEQA
Property Owner Who Proceeds With Development Under a Permit Cannot Challenge Land-Use Conditions Attached to the Permit
California Supreme Court Holds Governor’s Executive Order Setting 2050 GHG Targets Need Not Be Used As CEQA Significance Threshold
Supreme Court Announces New Test for Regulatory Takings Claims
Double Trouble - Is Black Sky Capital Blue Skies for Lenders?
Action to Invalidate Building Permit Barred by Failure to File Timely Challenge to Underlying Site Development Permit
In Citizens for Beach Rights v. City of San Diego, 10 Cal.App.5th 1301 (2017), the court of appeal held that a challenge to issuance of a building permit necessarily included a challenge to the validity of the underlying site development permit, which was barred by the 90-day statute of limitations in Government Code section 65009.
Referendum that Leaves in Place Zoning That is Inconsistent With General Plan Upheld
Court Must Defer to Local Agency Decisions if Supported by Substantial Evidence
Promised Public Subsidies Need Not Actually Be Received to Trigger Prevailing Wage
Attorney Neglect Not Grounds For Relief From Summary Judgment For Failure to Lodge Administrative Record
A party against whom summary judgment is entered as a result of attorney neglect may not seek relief under a statute that provides relief from a default judgment or dismissal resulting from attorney neglect. The Urban Wildlands Group, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 10 Cal. App. 5th 993 (2017).
CEQA Action Challenging Oil Well Permits Not Barred By Res Judicata