California Land Use & Development Law Report
California Land Use & Development Law Report
California Land Use & Development Law Report offers insights into legal issues relating to development and use of land and federal, state and local permitting and approval processes. Subscribe 🡢
![People on the street at dusk](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/people%20on%20the%20street.jpg?itok=vXTi8o69)
EIR Addendum Was Sufficient for Project Within Scope of Earlier Program EIR
The Court of Appeal upheld the City of Newport Beach's reliance on an EIR addendum to approve a residential project whose impacts had been evaluated in a 2006 Program EIR for a general plan update. Olen Properties Corp. v. City of Newport Beach, 93 Cal. App. 5th 270 (2023).
![Cannabis-Consumable](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-07/Cannabis%20Gummies.jpg?itok=Ie3Zy3p_)
Overlay Cannabis District Was Consistent with General Plan and EIR and Exempt from CEQA
The Court of Appeal held that the addition of cannabis retailers to existing commercial neighborhoods through an overlay zoning district was exempt from CEQA as consistent with the existing General Plan and related EIR. Lucas v. City of Pomona, 92 Cal.App.5th 508 (2023).
![View of office building at night](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/view%20of%20an%20office%20building%20at%20night.jpg?itok=03LMSy1F)
Court Upholds Project Description in EIR for UC Berkeley’s Fire Hazard Vegetation Reduction Plan
The court of appeal upheld the project description in the EIR for the University of California, Berkeley's fire hazard vegetation reduction plan, holding that it contained sufficient information to understand the plan's environmental impacts, including objective criteria for vegetation removal, even though it did not include a detailed tree inventory or disclose the exact number of trees that w
![Construction Equipment](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/Constructions_Equipment.jpg?itok=f0iAxzYD)
Preliminary Injunctions in CEQA Cases Require an Evaluation of Harm to the Public Interest in Informed Decision-Making
Concluding that it was a "near certainty" that the Stratford Public Utility District (SPUD) failed to comply with CEQA when it granted an easement for a water pipeline, the appellate court vacated an order denying a preliminary injunction that would have halted construction and operation of the pipeline, and ordered the trial court to reconsider. Tulare Lake Canal Co. v.
Ninth Circuit Upholds FAA’s Alternatives Analysis Limited to Airport Project and No Action Alternative But Invalidates EIS For Failure to Aggregate Construction Equipment Noise
The Ninth Circuit upheld the Federal Aviation Administration's decision to study only the project and the no action alternative in an EIS for a new passenger terminal. However, the court found the FAA violated NEPA by failing to account for the combined noise that could result from the simultaneous operation of different types of construction equipment. City of Los Angeles v.
![View of office building at night](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/view%20of%20an%20office%20building%20at%20night.jpg?itok=03LMSy1F)
New EIR and Senate Bill Mooted CEQA Challenge to Berkeley Enrollment Decisions
The Court of Appeal held that CEQA challenges to proposed student enrollment increases and development projects were moot due to an updated EIR that addressed the flaws in an earlier EIR, and in light of Senate Bill 118, which clarified that "enrollment or changes in enrollment, by themselves, do not constitute a project" for purposes of CEQA. Save Berkeley's Neighborhoods v.
![Pillars of a courthouse](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/Court_Pillars.jpg?itok=RoFQwkkM)
Junipero Serra Statue Not Historically Significant
The Court of Appeal rejected a challenge to the City of Buenaventura's removal of a statue, finding there was substantial evidence for the City's conclusion that the statue was not historically significant. Coalition for Historical Integrity v. City of San Buenaventura, 92 Cal.App.5th 430 (2023).
![Abstract image with purples](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/Colors%20Abstract.jpg?itok=9Q8pe5ca)
Berkeley Ordinance Banning Natural Gas Infrastructure Preempted by Federal Statute
The Ninth Circuit held that a Berkeley ordinance prohibiting natural gas infrastructure in new buildings was preempted by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act ("EPCA"), 42 U.S.C. § 6297(c), which regulates the energy use of natural gas appliances used in household and restaurant kitchens. California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley, 65 F. 4th 1045 (9th Cir., 2023).
![view of people meeting through glass wall](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/people%20meeting.jpg?itok=vfpf7STB)
Neighbor’s Appeal of Planning Commission Decision Did Not Support Anti-SLAPP Motion
The Court of Appeal ruled that the protected speech or petitioning activity on which an anti-SLAPP motion is based must be a target of the suit and not merely an event that triggered claims unrelated to such speech or activity. Durkin v. City and County of San Francisco, 90 Cal.App.5th 643 (2023).
![two people on laotops](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/people%20on%20laptops.jpg?itok=JCNkp8ze)
Court Held That Obligation to Further Fair Housing Requires More Than the Absence of Discrimination and That Base Zoning Allowing Lower Densities Violated Housing Element Law Even Though Overlay Zoning Required Minimum Densities
A court addressed the City of Clovis' repeated failures to accommodate lower-income housing needs.
![People on the street at dusk](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/people%20on%20the%20street.jpg?itok=vXTi8o69)
General Request for EIR Insufficient to Exhaust Administrative Remedies When Challenging Reliance on Categorical Exemption
Plaintiff did not exhaust administrative remedies when challenging the City's approval of a homeowner's development project on the ground that a Class 1 categorical exemption was inapplicable. Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. City of Arcadia, 88 Cal. App. 5th 418 (2023).
![view above looking down at forrest](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/tree%20tops.jpg?itok=0XdiD_fv)
Project with Potentially Significant Greenhouse Gas Emissions Improperly Approved Based on an EIR Addendum
![](http://live-perkins-coie.pantheonsite.io/sites/default/files/iStock-1220039743-656x369.jpg)
![View of office building at night](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/view%20of%20an%20office%20building%20at%20night.jpg?itok=03LMSy1F)
Units Converted from One Residential Use to Another Are Not Exempt from Rent Control under Costa-Hawkins
Remodeled residential units converted from space long dedicated to residential use are not considered new construction and are not exempt from local rent control under the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act. NCR Properties, LLC v. City of Berkeley, No. A163003 (1st Dist., March 9, 2023).
![abstract wavy metal](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/wavy%20grid%20%281%29.jpg?itok=8lwaCZ0U)
Bond Properly Required for Challenge to Affordable Housing
A local organization appealed the denial of its challenge to the approval of an affordable housing project and disputed the trial court's order requiring it to post a bond. The Court of Appeal rejected plaintiff's contentions on the merits and held that the plaintiff was properly required to post a bond because it was delaying an affordable housing project. Save Livermore Downtown v.
![Pillars of a courthouse](/sites/default/files/styles/widescreen_16x9_460x259_1x/public/2024-08/Court_Pillars.jpg?itok=RoFQwkkM)
Court of Appeal Upholds Most of EIR for New A’s Stadium
The First District Court of Appeal largely upheld the City of Oakland's EIR and CEQA findings for the Oakland A's proposed new baseball stadium and surrounding mixed-use development, with the exception of one mitigation measure that was improperly deferred. East Oakland Stadium Alliance v. City of Oakland, 89 Cal.App.5th 1226 (2023).