California Land Use & Development Law Report
California Land Use & Development Law Report
California Land Use & Development Law Report offers insights into legal issues relating to development and use of land and federal, state and local permitting and approval processes.
March 12, 2021
Case Properly Dismissed for Failure to Join Real Party in Interest Even Though Agency Did Not Provide Plaintiff with Corrected Notice of Determination
March 12, 2021
Claim Regarding Validity of 1974 Subdivision Map Barred Under Laches Doctrine
March 8, 2021
Court of Appeal Upholds Water Boards' Analysis of Economic Considerations Regarding Los Angeles County MS4 Permit
February 22, 2021
Lease of City Property Did Not Subject Nonprofit to Liability Under 42 U.S.C. section 1983
February 17, 2021
Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies by Appealing a CEQA Determination as Provided by Agency Regulations Precludes Later CEQA Suit
February 8, 2021
31st Annual Land Use and Development Law Briefing -- Materials Available
February 4, 2021
2020 Land Use and Development Case Summaries
January 28, 2021
EIS and Biological Opinion Invalidated for Offshore Alaska Oil Project
January 28, 2021
Regional Water Quality Control Board Unlawfully Delegated Authority to Modify Effluent Limits Under Discharge Permit
January 25, 2021
Ninth Circuit Upholds Environmental Assessment for Highway Project in State Park
January 20, 2021
Brown Act Does Not Require a Finding of Prejudice to Survive a Demurrer
January 14, 2021
Can a Responsible Agency Impose Mitigation Measures Not Considered in the Lead Agency's EIR?
January 7, 2021
Do Conservation Easements Provide Effective Mitigation for Loss of Farmland to Development?
January 6, 2021
Takings
Condemnee Need Not Entirely Vacate Premises to Recover Damages After Condemnation is Abandoned
Complete physical dispossession of a property is not a prerequisite to an award of damages after a condemnation proceeding is abandoned—moving from the property in reliance on the order granting the agency possession is sufficient. San Joaquin Regional Transit District v. Superior Court, No. C084755 (3rd Dist., Dec.
January 5, 2021
Initiatives and Referenda
Fifth Appellate District Agrees that Special Taxes Enacted by Initiative Do Not Require Two-Thirds Supermajority Vote.
Another court of appeal has held that local special taxes adopted by a citizen-sponsored initiative do not require two-thirds voter approval. City of Fresno v. Fresno Building Healthy Communities, No. F080264. (5th Dist., Dec. 17, 2020).