08.12.2019
|
Blogs
About Us
中文网站
Offices
Careers
Client Advantage
Client Login
08.12.2019
|
Blogs
One of the many challenges companies face when assessing their Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) liability is determining whether a potential business partner constitutes a “foreign government official” under the FCPA. From a definitional perspective, the FCPA is far from a model of clarity on this point. See 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2(h)(2)(A).
By way of example, consider the compliance sandbars companies must circumnavigate to determine whether (and when) providing something of value to “traditional authorities” (including First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples) could impose FCPA liability. This question often arises when U.S.-based companies are asked to make donations to American Indian tribes with whom they interact, or to do favors for individual members of a tribe. For instance, a tribal elder may ask that a company doing business with the tribe employ a certain tribal member, or provide an internship to the chief’s son, etc. Under such circumstances, companies might find themselves evaluating the contemplated transaction through the amorphic lens of the FCPA.
We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience and to improve the quality of our site. By continuing to use this website, you are demonstrating your consent to the placement and use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.