Skip to main content
Home
Home

Katherine M. Dugdale

Profile photo for Katherine M. Dugdale
Profile photo for Katherine M. Dugdale
Of Counsel

Katherine M. Dugdale

Katherine focuses her practice on intellectual property litigation and general commercial litigation.

Katherine Dugdale has particular experience in the area of trademark, copyright and related intellectual property litigation. She has handled copyright and trademark cases throughout the country on behalf of a major software developer. In addition to obtaining summary judgments on copyright and trademark claims, Katherine has obtained contempt orders, temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions and asset freezes. She has successfully argued trademark and copyright cases in front of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Additional litigation matters that Katherine has handled include successfully defending a national association against the entry of a preliminary injunction, representing a major airline in a commercial software dispute and obtaining summary judgment for claims involving the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). She also obtained summary judgment in one of the first civil rulings under the Anticounterfeiting Act of 2004.

In addition to her litigation practice, Katherine has extensive experience counseling clients in a variety of industries on intellectual property, brand protection strategies and right of privacy issues.

Katherine also has an active pro bono practice and has represented clients in immigration and adoption matters.

Education & Credentials

Education

  • USC Gould School of Law, J.D., 1993
  • University of California, Los Angeles, B.A., 1989

Bar and Court Admissions

  • California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Related Employment

  • Piper Rudnick, Los Angeles, CA, Partner, 2002-2004
  • Preston Gates & Ellis, Partner, 2002
  • Preston Gates & Ellis, Associate, 1996-2002

Professional Recognition

  • Named One of the 30 Most Influential Intellectual Property Lawyers by the Los Angeles Business Journal in August 2017

  • Listed in Law & Politics and Los Angeles magazines as a "Southern California Super Lawyers," 2007-2010; and as a “Southern California Rising Star,” 2004-2006

Impact

Professional Leadership

  • American Bar Association, Member
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association, Member
  • Bet Tzedek, Justice Ball Committee

Professional Experience

Litigation

Microsoft Corporation v. Buy More, Inc. 

Successfully represented software developer against distributor of infringing software. 136 F. Supp. 3d 1148 (C.D. Cal. 2015), aff'd, No. 15-56544, 2017 WL 2790693 (9th Cir. June 27, 2017)

Island Software and Computer Services, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation

Successfully represented software developer in counterfeit action. 413 F.3d 257 (2d Cir. 2005)

Microsoft Corporation v. Computer Support Services of Carolina Inc.

Successfully represented software developer in dismissal of antitrust claims. 123 F. Supp. 2d 945 (W.D.N.C. 2000)

Microsoft Corporation v. Image & Business Solutions Inc.

Successfully represented software developer against distributor of infringing software and illicit Certificate of Authenticity labels in one of the first civil rulings under the Anti-Counterfeiting Act of 2004. The court awarded $1,257,500 in damages on summary judgment for trademark and copyright infringement and violation of the Anti-Counterfeiting Act of 2004. 2007 WL 2874430 (C.D. Cal. May 4, 2007)

Microsoft Corporation v. Silver Star Micro Inc.

Summary judgment award for violation of the DMCA and copyright and trademark infringement. 2008 WL 115006 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 9, 2008)

Home
Jump back to top